[ liberty / monarchy ] [ fascist ] [ meta ]

/fascist/ - Surf the Kali Yuga

Fascism and the Third Position
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

5808e No.9[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Self-explanatory. If you have a one-liner question won't generate much discussion and isn't related to moderation or requests, post it here.
317 posts and 86 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

640fc No.8514

Did it fix?



File: daf285f8aae70c0024dee0a3360c8dee-imagejpeg.jpg (54.74 KB, 640x713, hitler brown house.jpg)

28b53 No.1[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

WELCOME TO /FASCIST/, PLEASE READ RULES BEFORE POSTING

Our Bunkers —
https://anon.cafe/fascist/ (primary, first fallback)
Neinchan on Tor:
vvadkyuldkwon6za.onion/fascist/catalog.html

Welcome to the new location of /fascist/ on JulayWorld! /fascist/ is a board for discussion of fascism in its various manifestations and, in a more general sense, third-position ideology (e.g. Strasserism, etc) and positions that fall outside of the /pol/ - /leftypol/ dichotomy. Though this board is centered around the discussion of fascist movements, leaders and ideology, everybody is permitted to post here regardless of political beliefs, as long as they debate in good faith. Non-fascists and opposing beliefs of all kinds are welcome as long as they respect the rules of this board! This thread will also serve as a thread for requests to moderation, banners and general bitching

BOARD RULES
1. Global rules apply
2. No spam, no flooding, serial double- / triple-posting in the same thread within a short period of time will result in a short ban
3. No fedposting*
4. No avatarfagging without reason
5. No pornography (non-sexualized nudity permitted)
6. Gore should be spoiled and relevant to the topic if posted
7. No self-advertising outside of specifically designated threads. No Disc.ord shilling, period.
8. Threads with basic questions not conductive to discussion should go in the QTDDTOT >>9
9. Literature requests should go in the proper thread >>5
10. Meta content should be posted here >>1

*fedposting is encouraging anons to "take action" in a way that reads like a federal agent is posting it, e.g. "Hey kid, you wanna bomb a federal building?"

Some archives of the old board:
https://web.archive.org/web/*/8ch.net/fascist/
----------------------------------------------------------------
In-depth overview for newfags / those interested:
WHAT TYPE Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
250 posts and 78 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

28b53 No.8479

File: 1589875594123.jpg (222.33 KB, 960x1280, 1564005675175.jpg)

test for image posting



File: e1bb05099f6cc2961d3dc2a9434840c7-imagepng.png (180.28 KB, 251x374, ClipboardImage.png)

3f5fe No.5[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Post good works that you've read and ask for recommendations ITT.

The list below only consists of works that I myself have personally read. If anybody can vouch for any other good works, let me know!

BASIC READING LIST
National Socialism (NSDAP):

>Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler

There are many editions of this book, of course. The best are Thomas Dalton’s new translation and of course Stalag. I’ve also read Manheim and didn’t think it was too bad, but it’s a little too wordy and is translated by a Jew
>Zweites Buch by Adolf Hitler
>The Program of the NSDAP by Gottfried Feder
>The Manifesto for the Breaking of Interest Slavery by Gottfried Feder

Black Front / Strasserism:
>German Tomorrow by Dr. Otto Strasser
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
165 posts and 154 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

edfeb No.8456

File: 1589753150173.png (430.31 KB, 480x321, linkola forest.png)

>>8453
I thought Kaczynski covered this issue particularly well in his Anti-Tech Revolution: Why and How with all of his talk of self-propagating systems and how they operate. I think eco-fascism is much more tenable though and will see its day in the sun. There is a good reason why this term is becoming more and more fearmongered about despite it having little to no IRL presence yet beyond Linkola's books and Tarrant and Crusius' attacks. Ecofascism is undeniably Luddite-minded, but from reading Linkola's own work we see that some technology and industry is kept and used for the establishment and enforcement of "green dictatorships". Kaczynski though might prove to be ultimately right with his collapse theories if this does not work, but only time will tell.



File: 1588954538292.png (571.53 KB, 500x649, ClipboardImage.png)

ec2eb No.8131[Reply]

In the past few decades the number of people diagnosed with autism has increased dramatically. This is a very concerning development. It is concerning bickers it is fundamentally unethical and irresponsible to allow autistic people to partake in society and to communicate with others.

Anybody who has ever dealt with an autistic person understands that the presence of an autist is burdensome and detrimental to its surroundings in any social context. Imagine any social gathering or event, such as spending time with your friends. Any such social gathering is not enjoyable when an autist is present. Despite there being many different forms of autism that articulate themselves in different ways (high functioning, low functioning and such), all of these have in common that they are a profound source of displeasure and discomfort to those who surround the patient. Autism is a unique disorder in that the people surrounding the patient suffer from it rather than the patient itself. When confronted with this basic fact, autists or their advocates will attempt to rebut by pointing to the importance of 'tolerance'. They say, you need to tolerate the autist and his annoying antics or else you're a bad person. But does it make you a bad person to simply not want your every day ruined by autists? Even if an autist is tolerated by others, that is merely a concious effort on their part to not slap the autist in the face and tell it to piss off. Subconsciously, you still rather want it to go away. I have attached a graphic showing the three levels of 'functionality' in autists. You will notice that all three levels, in some way, require support. This is support which autists like to pretend they are entitled to, even when they give absolutely nothing in return for receiving this support.

If there were competent and responsible people in charge of policy who can see the gravity of this issue, there would have been measures to contain autists and prevent them from participating in society. Unless there is a cure for this terrible disease, which is a societal disease, a good thing to do for the state would be to employ measures of containment such as incarceration in mental facilities.

However this is still not a perfect solution. An autist will always be a burden upon society, even if such measures are employed. Hence, the only conclusion is that euthanasia is the most optimal way to reduce this burden permanently. The autist, no matter how "high fuPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
53 posts and 14 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

0c8f1 No.8353

File: 1589570063110.gif (425.04 KB, 510x382, talmudvision.gif)

>>8348
I actually think it's quite sad to see someone like you so trapped within the materialist paradigm that you're unable to see anything outside of either being a Jewish drone or engaging in bread and circuses (which, again, is really synonymous with being a Jewish drone as well). I reject both, yet I still can find enjoyment outside of mindless distractions and corporate-approved channels.

c4230 No.8434

>>8334
>Autism is one of those things that a properly advanced society should work to eliminate

NO. make us go away.

>Watching and playing modern entertainment is degenerate to begin with.


u guise having fun is gay.

c4230 No.8435

>>8291
sterilizing soy bugmen is more constructive than sterilizing the autistic.

07081 No.8443

>>8434
The absolute state of tard arguments.
>>8435
Bugmen, believe it or not, can be rehabilitated. They're only how they are due to outside influences and media consumption. With a change in inputs they'd be changed men before you know it. These people are soulless husks and cowards. Most of them will go right along with the flow, while the particularly hardcore ones (Antifa goons that actually show up on the streets) will be dealt with how any authoritarian state deals with them.

c4230 No.8515

>>8443
You probably suck dick like SIEGE fags do



File: 898ad13d53d43352a532f0cb8ce22739-imagejpeg.jpg (177.63 KB, 587x799, bhagavad gita krishna krsn….jpg)

File: 76ddab987fb296363c96415ffb5fc152-imagepng.png (324.92 KB, 960x821, adl pagan.png)

File: 78d4299ed47bc9c5fcc2e77088657516-videowebm.webm (7.96 MB, 480x360, Hitler restorer of Dharma.webm)

d41dc No.385[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

EMBRACE ARYAN SPIRITUALITY
You need to read the Bhagavad Gita right now, anons. Drop whatever you're reading and pick it up.

Before a great battle, the Aryan warrior prince Arjuna suddenly loses his nerve at the prospects of killing his enemy, among whom are his friends and family. Arjuna thinks that participating this in battle would upset the balance of caste, family and dharma. Conflicted, he asks his friend Krishna (who is an avatar of God) for guidance. Riding out into the battlefield in a chariot, the focus on the external battle turns to the inner battle within Arjuna himself

What does Krishna tell his friend? Does he tell him to love his enemies and turn the other cheek like Yeshua bar Yosef tought? No, of course not, Krishna drops redpills, telling him to stop running away from his duty as a warrior. The soul is immortal and unkillable, there is nothing to lament if he does his duty, killing his friends and family. The soul will simply be reborn, the former body discarded. This must be done in a disciplined and disattached manner in the service of the Supreme Lord. Goyim will write paragraphs trying to explain away the Sermon on the Mount, or how Jesus called gentiles dogs, always failing. Christians know how bad this shit looks on them. Embrace Aryan spirituality.
683 posts and 158 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

1f9c3 No.8509

>>8475
Precisely, these were the aristocratic monarchies based on organic structures, natural law and Dharmic principles. They were also meritocratic and allowed for social mobility, but without having the flaws of oligarchic systems where every clan and individual constantly plots and tries to overthrow each other as those changes were usually multi-generational and set certain standards which had to be reached rather than trying to bring everyone else down so you keep power no matter how much of a total failure you are. Also, people were not considered a property of decadent rulers, they even didn't have to pay taxes to them, but had to abide by some of their decisions because it was considered to be for the common good. Inversely, rulers had no interests in trying to exploit the population, but rather, to seek to benefit and improve it, as such benefits would reflect heavily on their personal and family status and well being. But there was one requirement, common race. There were also wars between different Aryan tribes (a later development when they grew more populous), but they were not wars of extermination. It pretty much combined the best elements of far more modern political systems in an organic, holistic, teleological synthesis while seeking to eliminate most of their flaws, providing a good balance of eugenics and stability, meritocracy and heritage, personal interest and common good. People who may appear seemingly primitive to us today, were actually far smarter than all the kikes and crypto-kikes that wrote tomes and tomes on political and social organization, systems which kept failing one after another. Aristocracy is an antithesis to the parasitic, dysgenic, Talmudic society that we have today, and which we had for countless centuries (with some exceptions). NSDAP tried to revive this system, which is the actual reason why the forces of disintegration (that's the logical conclusion of every Talmudic system by design) went to war against them.

1f9c3 No.8510

>>8475
Precisely, these were the aristocratic monarchies based on organic structures, natural law and Dharmic principles. They were also meritocratic and allowed for social mobility, but without having the flaws of oligarchic systems where every clan and individual constantly plots and tries to overthrow each other as those changes were usually multi-generational and set certain standards which had to be reached rather than trying to bring everyone else down so you keep power no matter how much of a total failure you are. Also, people were not considered a property of decadent rulers, they even didn't have to pay taxes to them, but had to abide by some of their decisions because it was considered to be for the common good. Inversely, rulers had no interests in trying to exploit the population, but rather, to seek to benefit and improve it, as such benefits would reflect heavily on their personal and family status and well being. But there was one requirement, common race. There were also wars between different Aryan tribes (a later development when they grew more populous), but they were not wars of extermination. It pretty much combined the best elements of far more modern political systems in an organic, holistic, teleological synthesis while seeking to eliminate most of their flaws, providing a good balance of eugenics and stability, meritocracy and heritage, personal interest and common good. People who may appear seemingly primitive to us today, were actually far smarter than all the kikes and crypto-kikes that wrote tomes and tomes on political and social organization, systems which kept failing one after another. Aristocracy is the antithesis to the parasitic, dysgenic, Talmudic society that we have today, and which we had for countless centuries (with some exceptions). NSDAP tried to revive this system, which is the actual reason why the forces of disintegration (that's the logical conclusion of every Talmudic system by design) went to war against them. Fiscal and monetary independence, the alleged persecution of the Jews, were all secondary reasons.

1f9c3 No.8511

>>8475
Precisely, these were the aristocratic monarchies based on organic structures, natural law and Dharmic principles. They were also meritocratic and allowed for social mobility, but without having the flaws of oligarchic systems where every clan and individual constantly plots and tries to overthrow each other as those changes were usually multi-generational and set certain standards which had to be reached rather than trying to bring everyone else down so you keep power no matter how much of a total failure you are. Also, people were not considered a property of decadent rulers, they even didn't have to pay taxes to them, but had to abide by some of their decisions because it was considered to be for the common good. Inversely, rulers had no interests in trying to exploit the population, but rather, to seek to benefit and improve it, as such benefits would reflect heavily on their personal and family status and well being. But there was one requirement, common race. There were also wars between different Aryan tribes (a later development when they grew more populous), but they were not wars of extermination. It pretty much combined the best elements of far more modern political systems in an organic, holistic, teleological synthesis while seeking to eliminate most of their flaws, providing a good balance of eugenics and stability, meritocracy and heritage, personal interest and common good. People who may appear seemingly primitive to us today, were actually far smarter than all the kikes and crypto-kikes that wrote tomes and tomes on political and social organization, systems which kept failing one after another. Aristocracy is the antithesis to the parasitic, dysgenic, Talmudic society that we have today, and which we had for countless centuries (with some exceptions). NSDAP tried to revive this system, which is the actual reason why the forces of disintegration (that's the logical conclusion of every Talmudic system by design) went to war against them. Fiscal and monetary independence, the alleged persecution of the Jews, were all secondary reasons.

1f9c3 No.8512

>>8475
Precisely, these were the aristocratic monarchies based on organic structures, natural law and Dharmic principles. They were also meritocratic and allowed for social mobility, but without having the flaws of oligarchic systems where every clan and individual constantly plots and tries to overthrow each other as those changes were usually multi-generational and set certain standards which had to be reached rather than trying to bring everyone else down so you keep power no matter how much of a total failure you are. Also, people were not considered a property of decadent rulers, they even didn't have to pay taxes to them, but had to abide by some of their decisions because it was considered to be for the common good. Inversely, rulers had no interests in trying to exploit the population, but rather, to seek to benefit and improve it, as such benefits would reflect heavily on their personal and family status and well being. But there was one requirement, common race. There were also wars between different Aryan tribes (a later development when they grew more populous), but they were not wars of extermination. It pretty much combined the best elements of far more modern political systems in an organic, holistic, teleological synthesis while seeking to eliminate most of their flaws, providing a good balance of eugenics and stability, meritocracy and heritage, personal interest and common good. People who may appear seemingly primitive to us today, were actually far smarter than all the kikes and crypto-kikes that wrote tomes and tomes on political and social organization, systems which kept failing one after another. Aristocracy is the antithesis to the parasitic, dysgenic, Talmudic society that we have today, and which we had for countless centuries (with some exceptions). NSDAP tried to revive this system, which is the actual reason why the forces of disintegration (that's the logical conclusion of every Talmudic system by design) went to war against them. Fiscal and monetary independence, the alleged persecution of the Jews, were all secondary reasons.

1f9c3 No.8513

>>8475
Precisely, these were the aristocratic monarchies based on organic structures, natural law and Dharmic principles. They were also meritocratic and allowed for social mobility, but without having the flaws of oligarchic systems where every clan and individual constantly plots and tries to overthrow each other as those changes were usually multi-generational and set certain standards which had to be reached rather than trying to bring everyone else down so you keep power no matter how much of a total failure you are. Also, people were not considered a property of decadent rulers, they even didn't have to pay taxes to them, but had to abide by some of their decisions because it was considered to be for the common good. Inversely, rulers had no interests in trying to exploit the population, but rather, to seek to benefit and improve it, as such benefits would reflect heavily on their personal and family status and well being. But there was one requirement, common race. There were also wars between different Aryan tribes (a later development when they grew more populous), but they were not wars of extermination. It pretty much combined the best elements of far more modern political systems in an organic, holistic, teleological synthesis while seeking to eliminate most of their flaws, providing a good balance of eugenics and stability, meritocracy and heritage, personal interest and common good. People who may appear seemingly primitive to us today, were actually far smarter than all the kikes and crypto-kikes that wrote tomes and tomes on political and social organization, systems which kept failing one after another. Aristocracy is the antithesis to the parasitic, dysgenic, Talmudic society that we have today, and which we had for countless centuries (with some exceptions). NSDAP tried to revive this system, which is the actual reason why the forces of disintegration (that's the logical conclusion of every Talmudic system by design) went to war against them. Fiscal and monetary independence, the alleged persecution of the Jews, were all secondary reasons.



File: ab50f0c20b300df401ef065bedd5c3e0-imagejpeg.jpg (45.39 KB, 511x428, nationalfeelism.jpg)

File: bdd85813694236f00e0ca99d86067c31-imagejpeg.jpg (231.22 KB, 750x926, doctrine.jpg)

File: 18282d673d0ed315b0857ef4d1718fb5-videomp4.mp4 (19.63 MB, 640x360, The Not So Chosen People C….mp4)

2ea06 No.6309[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

>tl:dr Mysticism discussion thread.
<forgive me if this makes no sense lmao
The biggest dividing line between our own ilk for as long as I've been browsing /pol/ types is the "Christianity v.s Pagan" debate. I never took a side on this issue personally, because I think debating this is a waste of time and retarded. I kept this perspective when I read IronMarch. When I read the spiritual workshops and the long redpills people would drop that would swing either way (usually pro-christian), but when I read "Myth of the 20th Century", I felt as if this should have been the go-to answer. As if there was a third position to even the religious debate as there was the political debate.

The Western world was built off the legendary might of people before us, and brought to full glory by men who understood the deeper meaning of it all. The western esoteric. These men will be seen as gods in a thousand years the same way Hermes, for example, turned out to be. Even scientists like Isaac Newton, Nikola Tesla, all held highly esoteric beliefs that can be garnered from the rabbit hole of Esoteric Mysticism.
297 posts and 80 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

85493 No.8491

Abrahamic metaphysics leads to liberalism/ideology progressivism.

In the Abrahamic tradition, all men are "the same in the core." Have the same source man. There is indeed a tradition of misegenation acceptance in the Old Testament provided it's the head Jew doing it.

Jews see themselves as a special kind that all of them are entitled to being. Gods on Earth with only Yahweh as their lord. This is contrary to pre-Christian Europe which had its men be within hiearchies within hiearchies.

85493 No.8492

Abrahamic metaphysics leads to liberalism/ideology progressivism.

In the Abrahamic tradition, all men are "the same in the core." Have the same source man. There is indeed a tradition of misegenation acceptance in the Old Testament provided it's the head Jew doing it.

Jews see themselves as a special kind that all of them are entitled to being. Gods on Earth with only Yahweh as their lord. This is contrary to pre-Christian Europe which had its men be within hiearchies within hiearchies.

c0227 No.8495

Abrahamic metaphysics leads to "leftism." Largely since Jewish narcissism makes the Jews believe they're gods on Earth with only Yahweh as able to forbid them anything. "pagan" metaphysics on the other-hand accepts hiearchies within hiearchies.

Look at the Greek myths. Zeus was certainly not all-powerful and couldn't defy the Fates.

c0227 No.8496

Abrahamic metaphysics leads to "leftism." Largely since Jewish narcissism makes the Jews believe they're gods on Earth with only Yahweh as able to forbid them anything. "pagan" metaphysics on the other-hand accepts hiearchies within hiearchies.

Look at the Greek myths. Zeus was certainly not all-powerful and couldn't defy the Fates.

c0227 No.8497

Abrahamic metaphysics leads to "leftism." Largely since Jewish narcissism makes the Jews believe they're gods on Earth with only Yahweh as able to forbid them anything. "pagan" metaphysics on the other-hand accepts hiearchies within hiearchies.

Look at the Greek myths. Zeus was certainly not all-powerful and couldn't defy the Fates.



File: 1589700776901.png (132.21 KB, 3577x576, The Omega Redpill.png.png)

a2b44 No.8431[Reply]

This movement needs to grow some balls.
10 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

69951 No.8488

>>8484
The whole site was imploding yesterday, I’ll get this all cleaned up in a little bit

t. BO

a2b44 No.8493

>>8484
kek
the site has been having technical issues these days, it's not your fault.

a2b44 No.8494

>>8484
kek
the site has been having technical issues these days, it's not your fault.

446c3 No.8500


798e4 No.8503

>>8493
>>8494
Based and doublepostingpilled



File: 7d1163293b7a64c69b896d495c1c3e26-applicationpdf.pdf (1.71 MB, Adolf Hitler-Mi Lucha.pdf)

File: 1f86760925dd588a709b28f1dec8e632-applicationpdf.pdf (462.74 KB, la-doctrina-del-fascismo1.pdf)

e51f8 No.7969[Reply]

In this thread we post books translated to spanish.
>also
Someone's got/have or can traduce books like Siege or The Turner Diaries?

e51f8 No.7971

File: 42c3036aac938a54ddb67e00e2379a5a-applicationpdf.pdf (3.32 MB, El MNSCH - Declaraciones f….pdf)

File: 58c57f6b992138be04ba03e691f7ebef-applicationpdf.pdf (5.77 MB, Carlos Keller - Como Salir….pdf)

File: 42c3036aac938a54ddb67e00e2379a5a-applicationpdf.pdf (3.32 MB, El MNSCH - Declaraciones f….pdf)

File: 6a96881dcc13a9c4aba5ebc5c79b072f-applicationpdf.pdf (6.89 MB, ideario nacista.pdf)

I know you said "translated to Spanish", but if you don't mind I have a handful of MNS de Chile works that I have been meaning to dump somewhere for a while, I don't speak Spanish so maybe Spanish-speakers will appreciate these more.

e51f8 No.7972

File: dc75a6ec03e486be9b8d332b8497f19b-applicationpdf.pdf (5.02 MB, JG von Marées - La Concepc….pdf)

File: 7a7315c5b1b41db0d7778a492cf30d28-applicationpdf.pdf (2.02 MB, JG von Marées - Pueblo y E….pdf)

I have two or three bigger ones but they're too big to post.

b41d0 No.8092

File: 1588784906649.pdf (1.71 MB, Adolf Hitler-Mi Lucha.pdf)


f2352 No.8486

Was Derrota Mundial ever translated to English?
if not I could try and give it an amateur shot in my free time.



File: a48b212d7bc053879cc4a925910319a1-imagejpeg.jpg (60.1 KB, 600x400, breker.jpg)

File: b7b53a4ce3bfb306a50c96fe9ef2111f-imagepng.png (2.11 MB, 1057x660, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 89f94bdfe4ab1b8089dd4ad73fda6fa4-imagejpeg.jpg (168.94 KB, 800x528, alexander averin.jpg)

c4db1 No.5714[Reply]

Redpill me on aesthetics, /fascist/. Is there a unified fascist or traditionalist aesthetic? What constitutes good aesthetics? I personally wholly cannot agree with the maxim that "In matters of taste, there can be no disputes", as there are some things which almost no one at all finds beautiful or appealing to the eye. I think we can all agree that we live in age of tremendous ugliness and degeneracy; one just has to look at the average urban area, highway, or copy-paste suburbs - grey, ugly, dirty, and completely utilitarian. Beyond that clothing has been reduced to mere utilitarian functions, or if not that as a way to cater to degeneracy in emphasizing certain parts of the body. Compare what people wear today to almost any form of traditional clothing and notice how they are the opposite of "soulless"


How can we implement our aesthetics into daily life? This will doubtlessly come up, but I don't think "LARPing" is a valid criticism if one truly embodies their values in a non-cringy way.
57 posts and 74 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

8af7c No.8047

File: 1588615725074.png (1007.91 KB, 1282x484, April.png)

April was slow

c4db1 No.8049

File: 1588617450815-0.jpg (35.61 KB, 500x336, ted woods.jpg)

File: 1588617450815-1.jpg (95.54 KB, 500x392, ted photo.jpg)

File: 1588617450815-2.jpg (132.59 KB, 540x768, gas mask motorcycle.jpg)

File: 1588617450815-3.jpg (131.1 KB, 950x1234, gas mask dog man.jpg)

>>8047
You definitely got some good ones, I think though

c9777 No.8460

>>8049
Teddy sure was a bit photogenic
This moths seems to have more than the least, the only problem are that certain posts have a format that screws up my theme and I rather delete them before having them destroy my A E S T H E T I C
A real shame since I really likes a picture of a dress dress, the description said
>• Skirt suit.
>Designer: Christian Dior
>Date: 1947
>Place of origin: Italy
>Medium: Wool

1d795 No.8474

>>7675
You could make the argument for Sicilians but those genes in Spanish people are derived from an earlier migration into north Africa and the subsequent migration back into Iberia. Long before any arabs arrived, and on top of that the Umayyad caliphate that occupied the area relied on the converted populace of Iberia to act as the occupation force for those hundreds of years not arabic moors.

c9777 No.8483

File: 1589877973217.jpg (49.75 KB, 500x750, Dress.jpg)

>>8460
Image-posting is back, my dudes, here is the dam dress



File: d80b7ee0e3a35d182975e374b621e601-imagejpeg.jpg (89 KB, 500x664, unabomber ted kaczynski sk….jpg)

File: 51f626c54fac7358f11e058b0d9296b0-imagepng.png (218.36 KB, 496x556, tree spiker.PNG)

File: b81ad5764320f831058987f4b4621bfe-imagepng.png (167.55 KB, 878x420, pentti linkola war.png)

File: 8ea16d9d4b3415ff30027d11ad90aafa-imagepng.png (581.06 KB, 601x357, ClipboardImage.png)

58840 No.31[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

I think it would be best this time around to merge deep ecology and anti-tech into a single thread since there is so much overlap.

Old thread archive:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190804033752/https://8ch.net/fascist/res/13412.html

CORE READING
>Technological Slavery by Theodore J. Kaczynski (2019 edition)
> The Technological Society by Jacques Ellul
> Industrial Society and Its Future by Theodore J. Kaczynski
> Anti-Tech Revolution: Why and How? by Theodore J. Kaczynski
> Can Life Prevail? by Pentti Linkola
>Man and Technics by Oswald Spengler
> The Collapse of Complex Societies by Joseph A. Tainter


OTHER GOOD READS
> The Riddle of Amish Culture by Donald Kraybill (gives good insight into why the Amish do what they do and how it helps preserve stable, close knit communities lacking many of the defects of the degenerate secular world).
> Ecodefense: A Field Guide to Monkeywrenching by Dave Foreman
> The NS Kindred Experiment
https://archive.fo/KRudX
> Back To The Land by Jost Turner
https://archive.fo/ARemE
http://www.penttilinkola.com/pentti_linkola/ecofascism/
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/category/author/ted-kaczynski
http://www.national-anarchist.net/2010/09/national-anarchist-movement-manifesto_18.html?m=1

Really any books on local edible plants and living in a low-techPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
277 posts and 162 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

2f49a No.8389

>>8362
If that is an attempt at demoralization, then you are wasting your time. If think that you are « Just pointing-out the obvious » then you should know that doing so is also a waste, you should value your finite time a bit more.
I am here to break that paradigm, no matter how little faith others have in me.

>>8255
Even if I am right, I do not want to give (((them))) any way of subverting our message. I am not saying that invading countries is right, but that Africans have no excuse to still act like a bunch of slaves. This, of course, I do assuming that They are capable of more, I always give groups the benefit of doubt, not like I plan on helping them at all as they should rise on their own merit, if they fail then so be it.

>much of it was a mistake when we look at the consequences

Technology is a series of pandora boxes, but I am not too cynical about it since I see the things that come from those boxes less than agents of pure destruction, and more like fire, something which can be very useful if kept under control, but that can also engulf you in an instant if you let it grow uncontrollably. I believe this fire can be controlled

4ec98 No.8444

>>8389
I'd like to think that the fire can be controlled, but even to begin controlling this fire would involve a drastic change in the day-to-time lives of people today and a large scaling-back of one kind or another. This will almost impossible to ever bring back without a profound ideological change. We can recognize existing and potential problems within the technological society of today, but will any individual truly see it in their interest to act upon or reject it when they are reared in a nihilistic and materialistic environment which prioritizes only the "now" without concern for either future consequences or any sort of continuity with the past. The only force, I think, which can dislocating effects of technique, would be some form of religious fundamentalism that refuses to submit to the logic of today's society, rejecting its mindset in total. Does that mean all technology is rejected? Not in the slightest, but the world would be very different than today, much simpler. The first big challenge will come very soon - automation. We will soon if humans are content to become useless slaves or if they will reject even a single aspect of the drive towards endless efficient ordering, regimentation and "progress"

c31f6 No.8450

File: 1589748911359.jpg (81.18 KB, 378x800, Both you and the Tiger run….jpg)

>>8444
With those digits anything is possible

Change is gradual, sometimes even unnoticeable. But I think this is where « Ride the Tiger » comes in, not as an admission of defeat, but as a way to recognize what is important. I have said manny times that I do not care about 90% of the population, even 99%; so I would never attempt to solve society's problems in a nation-wide scale. At this moment I only concentrate on myself; refining my ideas and methods, learning and finding out what I really want from life. In a few years I will have to do the same with my family; to look how to translate this in order to incorporate in the family-dynamic. Then come all the friends and acquaintances I make trough the years, naturally they will hold similar ideas so helping them is not going to be specially difficult. This are the people I want to protect, these people who I will recognize as my Nation, everyone else can get replaced by machines for all I care, meanwhile my clique will help one-another trough the generations until we finally exit the Kali Yuga. The only thing I will need to fight for is to be left alone, paradoxically meaning that I will have to engage in society, but since I have no attachment to it I do not hesitate when taking advantage of the injustice of this rotten world, meaning that social mobility is quite easy. Yes, this makes me a massive jew, but only to those on the wrong side. However, my intentions are to reduce this interaction over time, (((They))) are committing a mistake by becoming dependent on the very system they exploit, being dependent on slaves ultimately makes you the king of all slaves.

Your last sentence is upsetting, not because of the looming feeling of outdatedness it implies, but its passive and defeatist attitude. Society affects us and it is imposible to be completely independent, but we are neither completely subjected by the ripples of society's change, you have your free will; everyone is a subject of modernity because they choose to, not because there is an actual force obligating us to participate, the greatest achievement of (((Them))) is the illusion of power they have created.

3540b No.8455

File: 1589751560433.png (2.5 MB, 1008x2000, asuka rebuilds.png)

>>8450
>I have said manny times that I do not care about 90% of the population, even 99%; so I would never attempt to solve society's problems in a nation-wide scale
I can definitely understand your mindset in regards to people. I can often come off as quite misanthropic or at least pessimistic towards any sort of notion of innate "human goodness", but I think solving our problems in the long-term honestly necessitates action on a nationwide scale. I am certainly a proponent of people acting in their capacity and doing what they can do, but any actions taken by individuals or small groups of individuals are inherently limited in what they can accomplish, and will always be threatened by actions of the rest of humanity and their often destructive actions. So while I would most likely act as far as my own capacities allow me to, I think it's important to always think big about these things. The liberal / ZOG hegemony over the Earth is deadly and seductive, and its psychological and material war against everything that is not itself is unrelenting. It knows no accommodation with itself.

>everyone is a subject of modernity because they choose to, not because there is an actual force obligating us to participate

I think a lot of people are quite unable to see an alternative as even being possible or desirable. I'm about to start sounding like a schizo here, but we are bombarded 24/7 from birth by propaganda and messaging through dozens of mediums whether it be entertainment, news, television, the Internet, music, advertising and the like, not to mention education which is merely a way today to integrate people into the system and condition them into certain ways of thinking and acting. Unlike what people think of propaganda usually, it's not an intellectual debate to try to convince, its a form of psychological warfare on your mind that manipulates your subconscious. Psychological rape.

Just think of Asuka getting mind-broken by that one angel in Eva. That's the average person today

c31f6 No.8458

File: 1589755645865.png (180.73 KB, 413x721, 1564009573741.png)

>>8455
Oh, I am thinking big, since in order to protect my interests I need to hold quite some power. My long-therm plan if for my family to become Rothschild 2.0 —Ahora en español—. My family are all business people so it is natural for me to seek power this way, a bit contradictory since I prefer small business, but I will keep a separation between activities that serve only to leech from the current world, and ones that will serve as a model for the future, which is where the network of acquaintances come in, instead of being a group which uses its connections in order to hoard resources and power, we will help each-other to make our vision of the future possible.

Have you heard about Nippon Kaigi? They are a conservative organization which has its hands in manny aspects of Japanese society and politics. Of course, it would be naïve to not think that they have being infiltrated by the Globohomo, but the methods are similar to what I want. Hopefully we should be able to set up a school for my children to go, in order to minimize their early exposure to the psychological bombardment you were talking about. Add that to the fact that I plan to live far from the city but have manny children, meaning that they will not suffer much from isolation during their most critical times, then I will leave them out in the world, confident that they will be able to repel the seduction of modernity, to also keep on my work and expanding it more than what I was able to.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSXNv1ksmQQ

Also, this group will only accept Asukachads

I would recommend following this conversation >>781 as to not fill this thread with off-topic posts and to make more threads active again, there is also >>6172 if you —or anyone— want to discuss education



Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ liberty / monarchy ] [ fascist ] [ meta ]